Search found 11 matches

by kaelisebonrai
Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:53 pm
Forum: Foundry (JIRA/Fisheye/Crucible or Mantis)
Topic: Possible Foundry Outage, June 23 2012
Replies: 41
Views: 21271

Re: Possible Foundry Outage, June 23 2012

Gee... aren't we glad there are BitBucket Repos?
by kaelisebonrai
Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:49 am
Forum: CyanWorlds.com Engine - Client & Plugin
Topic: Incomplete 1.906 push?
Replies: 20
Views: 3492

Re: Incomplete 1.906 push?

Marten wrote:If source code is automatically generated...
... can it truly be called source code, anyway?
:mrgreen:
Yes it can, and seeing as the rules appear to have changed around here, I add the following ", you ass" >.>

Moderator's Note: Poster warned for failing to observe Forum Rule 2.
by kaelisebonrai
Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:00 am
Forum: CyanWorlds.com Engine - Client & Plugin
Topic: Incomplete 1.906 push?
Replies: 20
Views: 3492

Re: Incomplete 1.906 push?

...Um.. not the biggest deal in the world? Cyan is now in violation of the GNU GPL version 3. This is opening them to legal issues in the future. I suspect they'd rather not have that - along with the loss of reputation that comes with being gpl violating scumbags. The open source community takes su...
by kaelisebonrai
Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:56 pm
Forum: CyanWorlds.com Engine - Client & Plugin
Topic: Proposed Open Source License update
Replies: 21
Views: 5106

Re: Proposed Open Source License update

This all looks good... But I do agree with branan - content credits should be in a different file. Keep in mind, as well (as much as I shouldn't have to say this - we have had this mess happen due to unfamiliarity with the gpl, so it is possible that this could be overlooked, as well...) that any an...
by kaelisebonrai
Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:08 pm
Forum: Management
Topic: Content Licensing
Replies: 206
Views: 87566

Re: Content Licensing

@Mac_Fife, as an artist, I wholeheartedly disagree. I agree with branan, however... As an artist, I feel that if one wishes to use my art, that I would happily share with them... They should also share with others, down the line, and those people, with yet more, down the line. And so on. Such is the...
by kaelisebonrai
Wed Jun 02, 2010 3:24 am
Forum: Standards For Discussion & Debate
Topic: Flaming
Replies: 13
Views: 7373

Re: Flaming

As much as you may prefer Virginia's book, the actual netiquette spec is RFC 1855. If you refer to "netiquette" you refer to RFC 1855. =) Also, noting that RFC 1855 was written /later/ than Virgina's book, it is also more "current", such as it is. So, regardless of your fondness, the 1994 book is ou...
by kaelisebonrai
Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:48 am
Forum: Wireshark Plugin For Uru Client Protocol
Topic: Public-Private Keys (WireShark)
Replies: 26
Views: 8739

Re: Public-Private Keys (WireShark)

You, uh.. just proved you didn't understand it. =) If there is a private key, and a public key. The public key is /shared/, and the private key is kept private. If, as Christian said... the server data does not hardcode the private key, then, why give up on encryption? The private key is /still/ pri...
by kaelisebonrai
Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:34 am
Forum: Standards For Discussion & Debate
Topic: Flaming
Replies: 13
Views: 7373

Re: Flaming

While the Netiquette rules are a useful tool, many of the original rules were devised for a /very/ different internet as there is today. =) http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 <-- this is the correct reference for the rules. RFC 1855 is the correct spec for Netiquette. =) As you can see, there are *m...
by kaelisebonrai
Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:12 pm
Forum: Questions
Topic: Cloth?
Replies: 10
Views: 4606

Re: Cloth?

On a similar note, it'd be nice to use ODE rather than PhysX, Might be nice, anyways.

Go to advanced search