Search found 95 matches

by Deledrius
Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:37 am
Forum: Management
Topic: RAD Game Tools License Concern - Immediate Action Required
Replies: 78
Views: 12794

Re: RAD Game Tools License Concern - Immediate Action Requir

Hi Adam, You are where I was this morning, until I got a further explanation. What I did not realize was whoever at Cyan wrote plLayerBink.cpp had copied the code nearly verbatim from the RAD Tools SDK sample code. And that is what is in violation of Cyan's agreement with RAD Tools. Which carries *...
by Deledrius
Thu Aug 09, 2012 5:54 pm
Forum: Management
Topic: Content Licensing
Replies: 206
Views: 14516

Re: Content Licensing

Not I. Based on what I was told I assume it's related to this post: viewtopic.php?p=6879#p6879
by Deledrius
Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:30 am
Forum: Management
Topic: Content Licensing
Replies: 206
Views: 14516

Re: Content Licensing

Good news, everyone! I've been asked to pass along some info from Cyan regarding the progress on licensing. It's light on details, with one exception: there was a question regarding the Peter Gabriel song used for Zandi's radio; as one might expect, the chain of rights is complicated and Cyan wasn't...
by Deledrius
Mon Jul 30, 2012 1:10 am
Forum: Management
Topic: Future MOULa updates
Replies: 21
Views: 2253

Re: Future MOULa updates

What JW said.

In addition, Cyan uses a different build system and code set-up in some small but non-trivial places, without which it would be impossible to remove the need for all QA, and would leave them still doing these final checks and deployment/integration testing.
by Deledrius
Sun Jul 15, 2012 1:00 am
Forum: Management
Topic: Content Licensing - Register of licensees
Replies: 16
Views: 1818

Re: Content Licensing - Register of licensees

So from here, where should further discussion go? Right now we're just talking about a problem rather than trying to correct it (Which is basically what's been going on for months now.). :) I say we begin drafting a test license and see where that leads us. There's no reason not to give it a try; t...
by Deledrius
Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:04 am
Forum: Management
Topic: Content Licensing
Replies: 206
Views: 14516

Re: Content Licensing

That sounds about right, from first hand experience.

Don't have that hand anymore.
by Deledrius
Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:01 am
Forum: Management
Topic: Content Licensing - Non-commercial use
Replies: 3
Views: 774

Re: Content Licensing - Non-commercial use

So much to discuss, and I've been busy the last two days converting PotS Ages to MOULa instead of writing and responding... Wording for MORE was to limit content to Plasma, now CWE, and I don't think the intent has changed. "MOUL" might be a misnomer. Not to say derivative use of CWE imagery (e.g., ...
by Deledrius
Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:53 am
Forum: Management
Topic: Content Licensing
Replies: 206
Views: 14516

Re: Content Licensing

JWPlatt wrote:That's business; deal with the dog and let the dog deal with the tail.

;)
But what happens when the tail wags the dog?!

;)
by Deledrius
Sat Jul 07, 2012 10:54 pm
Forum: Management
Topic: Content Licensing
Replies: 206
Views: 14516

Re: Content Licensing

OK, that's a long(ish) post, and I'm thinking that it may be better to have a separate thread for each point - it'd probably make it easier to respond to. I'm also in bed with a cold right now (no idea where that suddenly came from :?), so I'll only respond to a couple of those right now... Heh, so...
by Deledrius
Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:41 pm
Forum: Management
Topic: Content Licensing
Replies: 206
Views: 14516

Re: Content Licensing

Thanks Mac. I appreciate your directness. I'm no longer expecting anyone to belive me but, but what we have from Cyan is what is in my June 3 post and is essentially the same as I presented at the AGM. There is no more than that. What was sent back to Cyan in response are the questions and comments ...

Go to advanced search