+1

Ah, that’s a good example. While it would have been nice to have it on the formal request, I don’t think anything is lost, as it can still be added to the Additional Examples section of the wiki page. Would you like to do that? Probably not a bad idea. Deledrius, when I said separate audio tracks, ...

The video files are all in BINK format. We need a license to transcode and redistribute those videos in other formats. This is way in the future, but at some point I'd like to be able to replace the audio with other translations. For that, we'd need separate tracks of audio, bla bla bla. Just sayin...

Thanks!

Can you add a link to GULP at the bottom since it's referenced above without a URL?

I'm on board with real names. I'm not sure Tony knows me as OHB anyway lol. I do think we should all include our most closely held affiliation (OU, GoW, H'uru, GoMe, etc, using the full domain name) to give evidence of our unity on this issue. I thought we had discussed having entire groups sign? I ...

I suggest that each of you sign the document properly. Your avatar names alone are not an appropriate or professional method of identification. Cyan can not acknowledge a document like this one from anonymous contributors. This is perhaps the only point I'd really question...In many cases "identity...

I don't think we can just be like "Here do this" and throw some money at them as incentive. This is the process that Cyan asked for, right?

Leonardo wrote:...even better if we can have the support of entire groups/guilds...

I'll mention it to the GoG folks and see if Ja'de will approve a Guild signature.

I also think that a few "player" signatures wouldn't go wrong either - to show that the devs are trying to do something that the fans actually want and not just "we're doing this because we can". 93 people are currently participating to translate URU and they've done 24,027 translations. Surely tha...