I implemented the invite revocation because it was specified during the long discussions about kicking last year. I can implement this so that it only revokes the invitation for the age one is kicked from. That would make more sense IMO.

Sounds good to me! I'll take care of the remaining Python code then. So calling PtKickClient could be done like this? PtKickClient(pid,msg)
Or should we drop the custom message and just make it a general message?

OK, so no new sophisticated command input and back to the old typing method. Got it. On an unrelated note, I dislike the fiddly-ness of the linking code here. If you are amendable, D'Lanor, I can fix ptVault.amOwnerOfCurrentAge() in the engine to correctly handle the case where the AgeOwners folder ...

Without making any moral judgments on this, I think I'd prefer "/kick <user> <msg>" over an age list click for <user>. During lag because of high population, an age list click gets squirrely. And the mixed mode between graphical click and textual command to complete a single action seems disjointed...

And if anyone thought my latest fixes were controversial... ;) here is something that is bound to cause an even greater stir: A /kick command proposal. For the code see: https://bitbucket.org/D_Lanor/moulscript-dlanor/changeset/794d0915623e How to use : Select the player to be kicked in the AGE PLAY...

Not just the build ID. As we speak nothing in the Cyan reference repo has been updated to 912 yet.

This applies only to Cyan's build process, doesn't it? How would anyone else be able to test it?

Just a reminder: The Cyan reference repositories still need to be updated to 1.912.

Hoikas, I did appreciate your point about asking Cyan to add the missing share book seek behavior. That would be the correct way to fix the Kadish alternate vault book (which btw is also missing a share book region). JWPlatt, can you bring this up next time you have a chat with Chogon? It doesn't ev...

Ehren wrote:What about Eder Delin and Eder Tsogal? Aren't those child ages? But any non-neighbor can go to the same one.

No, they are sub ages.