Stucuk wrote: You stated that you were only putting positive ideas on the list.
No… I said I putting them a positive frame. I never said only positive ideas. You misunderstood. It isn’t saying only ideas that are positive. It is a statement about how the wording is phrased.
Nal @ MOUL wrote: I’m going to paraphrase the ideas presented herein. I am attempting to frame them in positive statements. The point is to make the ideas more usable. If I missed your idea/point, don’t take it personally, just correct me and expand your idea/point. If I omitted your idea, it is an oversight. Point it out. Also, I’m leaving out the negatives, why something may not work. […]
If the highlighted sentence is what makes you think I’m leaving out ideas, you mis-inferred my meaning. For instance, there are many posts in the thread about why adding a currency system is not a good idea. I omitted those. I omitted the reasons against currency but included the currency idea.
Stucuk wrote: The way around the problem of people not accepting a group of people's decisions is to have people from what are already accepted developers.
I understand you think that. What Zardos, semplerfi and I have tried to convey to you is that doesn’t work in this community.
Stucuk wrote: If you get people who are already accepted by people as developers of URU(Some who for example will be making decisions as to CWE's future at some stage) then people are far more likely to accept there decisions as to what goes into a community PRP pack.
You haven’t noticed that we already have problems with who is writing what code and reviewing which code and how it is to be managed?
That is not a convincing argument. More
likely does not eliminate the problem.
It is very likely that a group of none contributors will get more blow back than a group of contributors. But, the disrespect (that is a noun) is for any group attempting to make any decision for the community or even giving the APPEARANCE of doing so. It just doesn’t matter who does the ‘approval’, ‘filtering’, ‘selecting’, or whatever verb one chooses. If it is a group, even Cyan, there will be a problem.
Unless you have some new convincing points… I’m unconvinced and I don’t see this moving forward.