I think everyone has a basic idea of what intellectual honesty is. However, humans have biases, preferences and often unexamined beliefs. These color our world and perceptions. Having a personal belief challenged can draw a visceral reaction before one thinks about it. How we handle it shows some measure of our character and intellectual honesty. Do we speak and then think? Or the other way round? And when someone calls us on such a reaction?
For general use one can define intellectual honesty as keeping one’s convictions in proportion to one’s valid evidence. Some define it by a negative definition, defining what it is not, using intellectual dishonesty to define it; Intellectual dishonesty is dishonesty in performing intellectual activities like thought or communication. There are more specific definitions for academic and political uses. A broad definition is used by Jim Arvo at UCI (University of California Irvine); Honesty in the acquisition, analysis, and transmission of ideas.
Honesty becomes complex when we have unexamined beliefs, such as a religion or political outlook we grew up with. One often hears statements like ‘everyone knows…’ or ‘it’s obvious that…’ in relation to beliefs that are so foundational to our thinking we may not know when we acquired them. While others can see the fallacy in or lack of logic in our thinking, we often can’t.
The way we research, debate, think and discuss those challenges to beliefs has been considered and thought on for centuries. In the evolution of thinking some styles of debate have been recognized as being unfair, irrational, illogical and or intellectually dishonest. Some of the characteristics are so common they have names. (Reference: Signs of Intellectual Honesty – Intellectual Honesty & Intellectually-Dishonest Debate Tactics)
Ad hominem attacks or personal attacks are an effort to discredit the speaker rather than the idea. Unfortunately personal attacks are sometimes justified, so making a rule is complex. The descriptive use of a name that is relevant and objectively defined is usually acceptable. One that is ill defined or is so subjective that it tells the listener more about the speaker than the person being spoken about then one is usually being intellectually dishonest. The issue of relevance touches on why the name was used. If solely to discredit the speaker rather than the idea then it likely may be dishonest.
In popular vogue today is the idea that an ad hominem attack is typical of a last ditch tactic. When one runs out of ideas and substantive arguments they often resort to ad hominem attacks. For many it signals the end of honest discussion and de facto concession of the topic.
The illogical part of an ad hominem attack is in the form of;
Person ‘A’ says ‘something’.
Person ‘B’ says person ‘A’ is bad therefore ‘something’ can’t be true.
Is calling someone a Cyan lover or hater a fair tactic? Is it intellectually honest?
If discussing birth control, is calling someone Catholic a fair tactic? Is it intellectually honest?
If you can answer those questions, how would you put your decision process in a rule or guide line?
Intellectual Honesty
Open: A proposal for community standards of forum behavior
Moderator: Discussion & Debate Managers
Return to “Standards For Discussion & Debate”
Jump to
- How To Register And Post To The Forums Or Edit The Wiki
- OpenUru.org
- ↳ News & Announcements
- ↳ General Information
- ↳ Domain Development
- Resources & Tools
- ↳ Resource Information
- ↳ Domain (OpenUru.org)
- ↳ Foundry (JIRA/Fisheye/Crucible or Mantis)
- ↳ Bitbucket
- ↳ Wiki (MediaWiki)
- ↳ Blogs (WordPress MultiSite)
- ↳ Forums (phpBB)
- ↳ Support
- CyanWorlds.com Engine (CWE) Projects
- ↳ Management
- ↳ Information
- ↳ CWE FAQ
- ↳ CWE Wiki Page
- ↳ CWE Libraries
- ↳ MOSS
- ↳ MOSS Wiki Page
- ↳ CyanWorlds.com Engine - Servers
- ↳ CWE Servers Wiki Page
- ↳ CyanWorlds.com Engine - Client & Plugin
- ↳ CWE Client & Plugin Wiki Page
- ↳ Wireshark Plugin For Uru Client Protocol
- ↳ Wireshark Plugin Resource Links
- ↳ Wireshark Plugin Wiki Page
- ↳ OpenUru.org Minkata Test Shard
- ↳ Minkata Shard Signup Page
- Open Uru Infrastructure Projects
- ↳ OpenUru
- ↳ OpenUru Resource Links
- ↳ Cyan Worlds Sources & Tools
- ↳ System Concepts
- ↳ Building & Testing
- ↳ Myst/Uru-Style Hypergrid & Open Simulators
- ↳ Myst/Uru-style Hypergrid Projects
- ↳ Worlds Index
- ↳ Hypergrid & Second Life
- ↳ Myst/Uru-Style Story
- ↳ Modeling, Animation and Programming
- ↳ Grid Hosting & Financial Resources
- ↳ Client & Server Software
- Open Uru Creative & Community Projects
- ↳ Fan Content Discussions
- ↳ Guild Of Healers
- ↳ Guild Of Healers Events
- ↳ New Greeters
- ↳ New Greeters Website
- ↳ New Greeters Archive
- ↳ David's Journey
- ↳ OSCAR - Open Source Creation and Restoration
- ↳ Writers Club
- ↳ Explorer Journeys
- ↳ The Fall of a Sparrow: A Zardoz Project
- ↳ Standards For Discussion & Debate
- Open Forums
- ↳ Questions
- ↳ Suggestions
- ↳ Open Discussion
- Archives
- ↳ Project Archives
- ↳ MO:UL
- ↳ Eder D'Uru Project
- ↳ Announcements
- ↳ Eder D'Uru Guilds
- ↳ Spoiler-Free Discussion & Suggestions
- ↳ Spoiler Discussion
- ↳ Eder D'Uru Blog
- ↳ Eder D'Uru Second Life
- ↳ OHBot's Official Website
- ↳ OHBot Development Blog
- ↳ OHBot Bugtracking
- ↳ Community Contributions
- ↳ OHBot's Official Website
- ↳ OHBot Development Blog
- ↳ OHBot Bugtracking
- ↳ Development Documentation
- ↳ OHBot's Official Website
- ↳ OHBot Development Blog
- ↳ OHBot Bugtracking
- ↳ Groupware (Evaluation)
- ↳ OpenUru.org dotProject
- ↳ OpenUru.org eGroupware
- ↳ OpenUru.org PHProjekt
- ↳ OpenUru.org Project Open
- ↳ OpenUru.org OpenGoo
- ↳ Community Nexus