D'niWeb

Community, Project, and Forum Suggestions

Moderator: OpenUru.org Moderators

Gehn, lord of ages
Member
Posts: 281
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:17 pm

Re: D'niWeb

Post by Gehn, lord of ages »

realXCV wrote:What's the next debate ?
How the controls of the thing formerly known as info boothish should be made.

Here is my very ugly roughout (AutoShapes are not made for graceful Uru devices).
Image
You approach the screens and click on one of them (as shown in the top right). Before clicking on it, you can see the news that is up, but you cannot individually touch the controls.

The Default page for the imagers is the top menu. This would be a good place to explain the usage of the imagers. The buttons correspond to the other pages you can go to. "More..." just changes all the words next to the buttons to the next 9 sites (if there is any need).

Clicking on the buttons will take you to the corresponding site. Notice that the buttons dim when there aren't any options associated with them (and so clicking is futile). Clicking on the big blue button at the bottom takes you up to the menu (so from UruBlogs you go to the main site, from "Explorer's Blogs" you would be taken to the UruBlogs menu). (the orange line is supposed to be connecting the blue button and the orange arrow... :oops: )

The big purple thing is a KI interface. You click on something to say "create journey" (or whatever better word is chosen) and then insert a title and description. You fill in each one then hit "New Step" to add a step. Continue doing this until you've finished whatever quest you're making. You can delete the steps or the whole thing at any time.

Then go to one of the info screens and put your hand in a KI slot (represented by the circle :P ). The info screen will notice that you have unuploaded journeys and will ask you if you want to upload them. If you say "No", it will ask the same the next time you insert your KI (unless you delete all the KI journeys).
My posts represent the views of me, Gehn, lord of ages, and not any companies or groups which I don't belong to. :D
User avatar
Nalates
Member
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:50 pm

Re: D'niWeb

Post by Nalates »

On a side note... mining companies do use wireless underground communications.

Basically, repeaters are setup at strategic places and relay up to the surface or to stations wired to the surface.

Places like Marvel Cave in Missouri (and other tourist caves) use radios to keep guides in touch with the surface.

So, wireless underground is not something new or yet to be done.
Nalates
GoW, GoMa and GoA apprentice - Guildmaster GoC - SL = Nalates Urriah
realXCV
Member
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 am
Contact:

Re: D'niWeb

Post by realXCV »

Gehn, lord of ages wrote:
realXCV wrote:What's the next debate ?
Then go to one of the info screens and put your hand in a KI slot (represented by the circle :P ).
A KI detector (like in the imagers) would be better.
Nalates wrote:On a side note... mining companies do use wireless underground communications.

Basically, repeaters are setup at strategic places and relay up to the surface or to stations wired to the surface.

Places like Marvel Cave in Missouri (and other tourist caves) use radios to keep guides in touch with the surface.

So, wireless underground is not something new or yet to be done.
Radios and Internet are not the same thing.
User avatar
Mac_Fife
Member
Posts: 1239
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:38 am
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: D'niWeb

Post by Mac_Fife »

Gehn, lord of ages wrote:The buttons correspond to the other pages you can go to. "More..." just changes all the words next to the buttons to the next 9 sites (if there is any need).
Maybe it'd be simpler to have a touch screen and do without the buttons? In RL, ruggedised buttons meant for thousands of pushes by the general public on things like payphones, ATMs, etc., are fairly expensive to implement and so you tend to minimise the number of them you need. There's a break even point where it becomes cheaper overall to use a touch screen, so that might be argument that could carry over into here.

There's no obligation (that I can see so far) for any Information Points to be D'ni technology: They could just as easily be equipment placed in the cavern by the DRC, the local Cavern Explorers Club, the New Mexico Tourist Board, or whatever.
Mac_Fife
OpenUru.org wiki wrangler
realXCV
Member
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 am
Contact:

Re: D'niWeb

Post by realXCV »

Mac_Fife wrote:There's no obligation (that I can see so far) for any Information Points to be D'ni technology: They could just as easily be equipment placed in the cavern by the DRC, the local Cavern Explorers Club, the New Mexico Tourist Board, or whatever.
Human equipment using D'ni technology ?
Gehn, lord of ages
Member
Posts: 281
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:17 pm

Re: D'niWeb

Post by Gehn, lord of ages »

realXCV wrote:
Gehn, lord of ages wrote:
realXCV wrote:What's the next debate ?
Then go to one of the info screens and put your hand in a KI slot (represented by the circle :P ).
A KI detector (like in the imagers) would be better.
What were those like? It just notes the KI without you having to place it in a slot? That will work fine.
Maybe it'd be simpler to have a touch screen and do without the buttons? In RL, ruggedised buttons meant for thousands of pushes by the general public on things like payphones, ATMs, etc., are fairly expensive to implement and so you tend to minimise the number of them you need. There's a break even point where it becomes cheaper overall to use a touch screen, so that might be argument that could carry over into here.
Touchscreen would be simpler.
There's no obligation (that I can see so far) for any Information Points to be D'ni technology: They could just as easily be equipment placed in the cavern by the DRC, the local Cavern Explorers Club, the New Mexico Tourist Board, or whatever.
Human equipment using D'ni technology ?
The DRC has been able to connect up human and D'ni technology before, right? I imagine the KIs communication translates at some point to simple electrical signals (or magnetic, or something elemental like that) which could just be used to transmit website like information (just 1's and 0's, lots of them), and since there obviously are more than enough KIs stored around, they could use them. Or they could transmit through radio waves (IC: the interface data would all be at the booth, so that wouldn't have to be transferred, and the updates wouldn't have to be immediate) or some similar form.
My posts represent the views of me, Gehn, lord of ages, and not any companies or groups which I don't belong to. :D
realXCV
Member
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 am
Contact:

Re: D'niWeb

Post by realXCV »

Gehn, lord of ages wrote: What were those like? It just notes the KI without you having to place it in a slot? That will work fine.
It was something like that.
Human equipment using D'ni technology ?
The DRC has been able to connect up human and D'ni technology before, right? I imagine the KIs communication translates at some point to simple electrical signals (or magnetic, or something elemental like that) which could just be used to transmit website like information (just 1's and 0's, lots of them), and since there obviously are more than enough KIs stored around, they could use them. Or they could transmit through radio waves (IC: the interface data would all be at the booth, so that wouldn't have to be transferred, and the updates wouldn't have to be immediate) or some similar form.
It wasn't a question.
DarK
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:04 pm

Re: D'niWeb

Post by DarK »

realXCV wrote:Radios and Internet are not the same thing.
[OT] Technically in-correct in terms of Wireless networking, principals behind Wireless Networking are practially the same as audio radios, you are just working at higher frequences, and the problems that come with them :)
realXCV
Member
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 am
Contact:

Re: D'niWeb

Post by realXCV »

If you want to generalize, then yes; radios, phones, tv, cell phones, internet, bluetooth are all the same thing.
Gehn, lord of ages
Member
Posts: 281
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:17 pm

Re: D'niWeb

Post by Gehn, lord of ages »

realXCV wrote:If you want to generalize, then yes; radios, phones, tv, cell phones, internet, bluetooth are all the same thing.
No. "Internet" refers to the information, while radios, phones, and bluetooth refer to ways to transfer information. You could technically connect to the internet through radio wave transmission or bluetooth or tv.
My posts represent the views of me, Gehn, lord of ages, and not any companies or groups which I don't belong to. :D
Post Reply

Return to “Suggestions”